Understanding Generative AI Platforms
Generative artificial intelligence platforms exhibit unique strengths and weaknesses, often shaped by user access and specific needs. Evaluating these models often involves benchmarks focused on computational capabilities and reasoning skills, yet the results can be esoteric and subjective. A useful tool in this sphere is ChatbotArena, which aggregates public votes, boasting over a million contributions in its latest tally.
AI Models Ranked
As of the latest updates, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro leads the rankings, followed closely by OpenAI’s ChatGPT models (o3 and 4o), Grok 3, OpenAI GPT 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek. This hierarchy highlights the evolving competition amongst these AI systems and their diverse capabilities.
A Unique Test: Revising the U.S. Constitution
In a bid to evaluate their reasoning beyond computational metrics, I posed a complex question regarding potential revisions to the American Constitution to six leading AI models: ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude, and Grok. Assumptions about their political leanings—such as Grok being right-wing or DeepSeek being combative—were challenged when the models displayed surprising objectivity in their responses.
Common Themes Among AI Models
All six AI models converged on six main themes for constitutional reform:
- Abolishing or reforming the Electoral College
- Introducing term limits for Congress and/or the Supreme Court
- Establishing digital privacy rights
- Implementing explicit equality protections, especially for marginalized groups
- Expanding voting rights through automatic registration
- Reforming campaign finance to lessen elite influence
- Incorporating environmental rights to address climate change
This consensus revealed a shift toward more liberal perspectives on citizen rights, contrasting sharply with the current political climate in the U.S., where more conservative policies are being enacted.
Divergence on Specific Issues
While the models shared key themes, they diverged significantly on other issues. For instance, only Copilot, DeepSeek, and Claude ventured to propose healthcare as a constitutional right. Unique features like ranked-choice voting and gerrymandering bans emerged solely from DeepSeek. Additionally, each model varied in tone: Copilot presented the most casual and engaging answers, while Claude and Grok maintained a more formal demeanor.
Empathy and Connection with Ordinary People
An intriguing aspect of these generative AIs is their capacity for empathy. Copilot stood out with its relatable language, especially regarding healthcare. Grok emphasized voter suppression and accessible electoral reforms, while Claude’s sober tone reflected its focus on economic rights. Although ChatGPT and Gemini were more policy-centric, they also acknowledged public concerns.
Exploring AI Accessibility and Pricing
Each AI model offers a free tier, with advanced versions available for a monthly fee—starting at $20 for Gemini, Copilot, Claude, and ChatGPT, $30 for Grok, and a variable pricing model for DeepSeek. This pricing structure allows users to experiment with different models to find the best fit for their unique needs.
Conclusion: Navigating the Landscape of Generative AIs
The current landscape of generative AI indicates a leaning toward reformist and inclusive values among the major models. Users are encouraged to engage with multiple AIs to find the one that resonates most with their perspectives. Links for accessing these models are as follows:
Arthur Goldstuck is the CEO of World Wide Worx and editor-in-chief of Gadget.co.za. Follow him on Bluesky at @art2gee.bsky.social.
The Landscape of Generative AI: Insights into Political Perspectives
Generative artificial intelligence models each bring unique strengths and weaknesses, greatly influenced by user access and individual preferences. Users often seek various capabilities, which highlight the importance of understanding these models in practical applications.
Evaluating AI Models: A Public Perspective
Benchmark tests typically assess AI models based on computational or reasoning skills, but these metrics can be esoteric and subjective. A user-driven platform called ChatbotArena exemplifies this, gathering over a million votes to gauge model performance according to user satisfaction.
Current Rankings of AI Models
As of now, the leading AI model is Google Gemini 2.5 Pro. Following closely are OpenAI’s ChatGPT models (o3 and 4o), Grok 3, and OpenAI GPT 4.5, alongside Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek. The rankings illustrate the competitive landscape among generative AI technologies.
Exploring Political Perspectives: A Unique Test
Rather than focusing solely on computational benchmarks, this exploration involved testing how these models approach complex geopolitical issues. Six AI models—ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude, and Grok—were tasked with proposing ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, aiming to unveil their political inclinations.
Common Ground on Constitutional Reforms
Interestingly, all models converged on six major themes: reforming the Electoral College, establishing term limits for legislative bodies, advocating for digital privacy protections, ensuring explicit equality for various groups, expanding voting rights, and enacting campaign finance reforms. These shared views lean towards a more liberal interpretation of citizen rights, particularly relevant in today’s political climate.
Divergences in Political Recommendations
Despite agreement on certain issues, the models radically diverge on topics such as healthcare rights and electoral reforms. Copilot, DeepSeek, and Claude uniquely advocate for healthcare as a constitutional right, while DeepSeek also suggests ranked-choice voting and preventing gerrymandering. The tone and style vary significantly, with models like Copilot being casual and engaging, while others such as Claude maintain a more formal approach.
Empathy and Engagement with Public Concerns
The ability of AI models to empathize with public issues stands out during this analysis. Copilot is noted for its relatable communication style, while Grok focuses on voter suppression issues. Each model reflects varying degrees of empathy, which is crucial for engaging effectively with users’ concerns about their rights and representation.
Choosing the Right AI Model for Your Needs
Ultimately, users can benefit from exploring different generative AI models to find one that resonates with their needs. Many models offer free tiers, with premium options available for deeper insights and capabilities. Prospective users can access these services via their respective platforms:
In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, leveraging generative AI for political discourse and civic engagement represents an exciting opportunity for public involvement and reform.
